Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 68,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:44 am
In SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am
And as in Janus v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:39 am
Given the amount of commentary being addressed to the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:45 am
The Court of Appeal notably steered clear of adopting such a rigid approach in 10x Genomics v Nanostring. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
” One response was to give Congress concrete new powers to enforce the amendments, borrowing the “appropriate” language from Chief Justice Marshall’s epochal opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
From Ohio Court of Appeals Judge Robert Hendrickson's opinion Monday in Ehlers v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:36 am
In her dissent in Trump v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In the preamble to the Final Rule, HHS acknowledged that this broad language may make it challenging to operationalize the attestation requirement but stated that the “potentially related” language is here to stay. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
I’ll let you go first, since you went off to, I think, our 50th state, Hawaii, Marlene Gebauer 1:34 that’s right, I went to Hawaii, and both of us had some some we put some distance, you know, we put some miles on the airplane. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, which upheld the act. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:45 pm
Comparison of the 2021 Program v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 6:45 am
Interestingly, the scope of the injunction at this stage was limited to sale or supply (being the acts that would actually cause harm to the patentee), rather than other ‘infringing’ acts e.g. offer. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 6:20 am
Late last Friday, a federal court there issued an injunction preventing the rule from being applied to Texas state workers finding that the rule was likely unlawful. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
Shubert v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
The event itself, being the COVID-19 pandemic, was certainly outside of either party’s control. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
The event itself, being the COVID-19 pandemic, was certainly outside of either party’s control. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:40 am
It’s unclear whether the reaction to the decision is the most inflamed ever, but it’s certainly close enough that it would not be hyperbolic to say the 5-1-3 decision in Trump v. [read post]
