Search for: "BURKS V. STATE"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:53 pm
Justice Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:31 am
Burke delivered the decision.Link: [tinyurl.com] . [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:35 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:13 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Burke Jr., received 61.6 percent of the "yes" vote, thereby retaining his position.In the Federal Court system, Pennsylvania Middle District Judge Thomas I. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
L v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Burke. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am
State Highway Commission v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:13 am
”Burke v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:24 am
It will be argued, however, that in accepting the inevitability of mandatory state-formulated rules within corporate law as an effective proxy for (unattainable) optimal contractual outcomes, contractarianism’s market-liberal logic strays beyond its own self-asserted boundary between (private) civil society and (public) state. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:17 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:07 am
Sec. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) was supported by substantial evidence (Circle C Resources, Inc v Kobielusz, March 11, 2014, Burke, J). [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Burke & Angela J. [read post]
