Search for: "Bail v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2017, 10:00 am
Nearly 40 years ago, the United States Supreme Court held in Scott v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm
So individual judges assigned to the court part that handles bail review, warrants and other criminal matters not assigned to a particular judge are often involved in appointing counsel in these cases. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:56 am
Last week, a state court judge in Orange County, California, declared the end of a landmark lawsuit called Campbell v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:05 pm
"From October 30, 2018:Error of the Day A Lexis typo (possibly scanning error) in Excessiveness of Bail in State Cases, 7 A.L.R.6th 487. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
Mensing (09-993), Actavis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:52 am
In the case of Aleman v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
Authorities do not think he will be able to make bail at this point in time. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:29 pm
In May 2018, in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 3:20 pm
Most jurisdictions stated that bail and parole decision – making processes involving Aboriginal persons are informed by Gladue type information. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:36 pm
From today's opinion by Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, sitting by designation in Avenatti v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:15 am
. -- The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment. -- The Ninth Amendment emphasizes that certain rights being listed in the Constitution does not mean those are the only rights that belong to the people. -- The 10th Amendment states that any powers not granted to the federal government are reserved to the states and the people. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:15 pm
And after the Franklin National Bank failed, and was bailed out by the Fed, the Second Circuit concluded thatAbsent clear evidence of grossly arbitrary or capricious action on the part of [the Fed or the Treasury Department] ... it is not for the courts to say whether or not the actions taken were justified in the public interest, particularly where it vitally concerned the operation and stability of the nation's banking system.Huntington Towers, Ltd. v. [read post]
