Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
The Supreme Court upheld the free speech rights of state and local public-sector workers in Janus v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:18 am by Gerard Magliocca
This power, though, was never exercised and was ultimately seized by the Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  What I'm really looking for in Salazar is the question of whether Justice O'Connor's "Endorsement Test" is still viable or whether a minimum of five justices affirmatively stated that they were abandoning that approach adopted by a majority of the Supreme Court in Doe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: In the National Journal, Sophie Novack and Sam Baker report that the abortion-rights movement “is trying to roll back a wave of state laws that have successfully curtailed access to abortion, and their best hope for doing so . . [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:34 am
The Commission decided in favor of Baker, but on Monday, in Hands on Originals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Robert Brammer
The modern political question doctrine first emerged in Baker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:36 pm
The only case in which CAAF has heard oral argument this term in which it has not released its opinion is United States v. [read post]