Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 10:47 pm
Supreme Court struck down California's attempt to prosecute older molestation cases. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Nursing Homes: PATIENTS SUFFER SUB-PAR CARE AT CALIFORNIA FACILITIES, CLASS ACTION SAYS, Valentine v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Olmos Memorial Lecture at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
Two outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Salmonella serotype typhimurium DT104 infections linked to raw-milk cheese in Northern California. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
The granted case is CSX v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:49 am
The filing, ACLU of Northern California v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:58 am
Holomaxx asserts claims under the Wiretap Act, the Stored Communications Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the California Wiretapping statute, and California's unfair competition law. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm
The company hopes to beat the court of appeals ruling by claiming that California's distaste for bans on class actions tilts the playing field against arbitration. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:29 am
Meanwhile, the LA Times reports that “high courts in California and elsewhere have ruled that class-action bans are unconscionable and contrary to public policy. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am
The company argued that lower courts had wrongly held that the ban on class-action arbitration suits was “unconscionable. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:30 am
Supreme Court with an update on yesterday's oral argument in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:20 am
More on the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm
The Ninth Circuit applied California law to declare a class arbitration ban in AT&T Mobility's subscriber agreement unconscionable and therefore void. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:35 pm
High courts in California and elsewhere have ruled that class-action bans are unconscionable and contrary to public policy. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:35 pm
High courts in California and elsewhere have ruled that class-action bans are unconscionable and contrary to public policy. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:59 pm
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:51 am
Tinker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
However, keeping in line with the theme of surprise this week, Olson also joined forces with his opposing counsel in Bush v Gore, David Boies, to bring and win a federal suit to overturn Prop 8 banning gay marriage in California in Perry v Schwarzenegger.A few weeks ago, Google submitted a motion to the 2nd Circuit court to consolidate the appeals of Viacom and the class action suit headed by the Premier League. [read post]
