Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 6,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
That is, they may prune back the roots or branches to the property line without giving notice to the owners of the trees (although prudence suggests it may be wise to at least notify the neighbour of the intention to prune). [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
See NetCoalition v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 3:47 am
Executive Branch may do so "if, in its discretion, it deems it proper to do so. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am
Monasky v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court intonated in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
See Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:17 am
Accordingly, we agree with the court’s determination to grant that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction (see Deb v Hayut, 171 AD3d at 863; see also Estate of Norman v Perlman v Kelley, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2017-03966; decided herewith]). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:57 pm
" I have quoted a frequently cited passage from Lord Justice Cotton's judgment in Allcard v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Probationary employee terminated for alleged misuse of sick leave Curcio v New York City Dept. of Education, 55 AD3d 438 The New York City Department of Education dismissed a probationary physical education teacher, Louis Curcio, from his position and simultaneously reemployed him as a tenured teacher under his common branch license. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Black's dissent in Betts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:21 pm
The decision, Noel Canning v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:00 pm
Black's dissent in Betts v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Black's dissent in Betts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:55 pm
Objections from a foreign government or the Executive Branch may well determine the course of ATS litigation, but they are not relevant to the decision to recognize a cause of action. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
Texas left open the possibility that “a challenge to an Executive Branch policy that involves both the Executive Branch’s arrest or prosecution priorities and the Executive Branch’s provision of legal benefits or legal status could lead to a different standing analysis”. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Specifically, citing McCreary County v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:45 am
In that recent case, Ace Precision v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:25 am
Those cases, Windsor v. [read post]
