Search for: "Brennan v State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Earlier this month, retired Justice John Paul Stevens sat down with one of his former clerks, Stanford law professor Jeffrey Fisher, for an interview. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Thaler, covering certificates of appealability of habeas corpus cases from state court to federal court, and timeliness for filing for federal habeas corpus relief. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
-------------------*Here's Stevens, from Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir explaining how he concluded that the death penalty is now unconstitutional - a conclusion he stated in Baze v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 This was the issue considered in the recent British Columbia decision of Brennan v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am by Conor McEvily
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:22 am by Moria Miller
Congress is actually reaching out to mandate activity,” Barnett explained.Barnett argued that the scope of President Obama’s health care plan extends “outside the line that the Supreme Court has previously drawn” in cases such U.S v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:13 am by Jack Goldsmith
Rogue states and terrorists do not seek to attack us using conventional means. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am by Michael Rubin
Brennan Jr. in the October 1980 Term. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Below Gabor Rona has a sharp response to my earlier post on Charlie Savage’s story on the latest round of Johnson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 He says that as this is asserted as state practice, many will see it as freeing the United States to do what it wants; but he thinks this will lead other states to believe that they’re accountable for their uses of covert force,  as the United States says it is. [read post]