Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
The Times leader column, headed “Sarko’s way”, asks “Why is it that the French can deport their foreign undesirables but we in Britain cannot? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
“The Coalition’s Programme for Government pledged to ‘restore the rights of individuals in the face of encroaching state power, in keeping with Britain’s tradition of freedom and fairness. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:26 pm
I was reminded of this when a trail of links led me to some clips from Britain’s Got Talent. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
His predecessor, General Michael V. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held in Johnson Controls v Campbell and Anor that there was no service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (“TUPE”) where a centralised taxi booking service was brought back in-house by the client. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am
Industrial policy » Great Britain. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:35 pm
The New Yorker carries an extremely long but absorbing article about the Daily Mail and our national obsession with it (love it or hate it): Mail Supremacy: The Newspaper that Rules Britain. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Journalism and regulation Following the Daily Mail’s successful night at the Press Awards, the New Yorker has published a lengthy feature on the Daily Mail’s rise to “the most powerful newspaper in Britain“, available here. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
Leicester, Great Britain : Institute of Art and Law, 2002 xxx, 206 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Britain). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
"Not a legal earthquake, admittedly, but certainly a mild tremor.This may not be the last word in the case of Anschutz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
This is a shortened version of an article published by Rosalind English in the Journal of Environmental Law and Management November 2011: Cooperation and Public Goods: an evolutionary perspective on environmental law 23 ELM 278-283 In my 2011 post Why be nice? [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm
If it starts with a 2, the it is from Canada...3 is from Mexico,...and, etc. 1 = USA 2 = Canada 3 = Mexico 4 = USA 5 = Brazil J = Japan K = Korea L = Thailand S = Great Britain V = France or Yugoslavia W = Germany Y = Sweden or Finland Z = Italy [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:46 am
Through a project supported by the Great Britain China Centre (“GBCC”), Chinese academics and judges have been looking to our jurisdiction for guidance on how to protect Chinese media and journalists. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court in the landmark Alaska v John Doe case. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:57 pm
* Facebook v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:46 pm
Welcome to modern Britain. [read post]
