Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Issues of fact exist, however, as to whether Striano was involved in certain decisions regarding the handling of the mortgage foreclosure actions filed against the borrower and, if so, whether those decisions constituted an intervening cause of the plaintiffs' injuries (see Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734; Selletti v Liotti, 22 AD3d 739, 740; Blank v Harry Katz, P.C., 3 AD3d 512, 513). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Issues of fact exist, however, as to whether Striano was involved in certain decisions regarding the handling of the mortgage foreclosure actions filed against the borrower and, if so, whether those decisions constituted an intervening cause of the plaintiffs' injuries (see Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734; Selletti v Liotti, 22 AD3d 739, 740; Blank v Harry Katz, P.C., 3 AD3d 512, 513). [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:39 am
  In State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
      Tell us about one or two significant cases or experiences in your career.Quantel v Adobe in 1997 would be the first on the list. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
Brooks (NFP), an 11-page opinion, Judge May writes:Robert E. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:17 am
Times, a recent California study shows improvement of public schools in the state since settlement of the lawsuit Williams v. [read post]