Search for: "CH"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 8,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 10:42 pm
The recent decision of Chief Master Marsh in Ravenscroft v Canal & River Trust [2016] EWHC 2282 (Ch) considered whether an exception to this rule […] [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
Ch.; 11/20), which was Delaware’s first fully litigated COVID-19 deal termination case. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Ch.; 9/24) finding that J&J violated its earnout obligations in the merger agreement to acquire Auris Health. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
Oxfam v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2009] EWHC 3078 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 348 "The VAT & Duties Tribunal had jurisdiction under s 83(1)(c) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 to determine an appeal concerning recovery of input value added tax where the claim was based upon public law principles and the doctrine of legitimate [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Designated Officer for Sunderland Magistrates Court v Krager and another: [2011] EWHC 3283 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 367 “The Crown Court did not have exclusive jurisdiction in relation to all aspects of the enforcement of confiscation orders.” WLR Daily, 14th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:01 pm
Nice to see a CH link slipped in. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:00 am
Communications and electronic information - On April 27, 2010, Taiwan's legislature passed amendments to the 1995 Computer-Processed Personal Data Protection Law (Tien-nao ch'u-li ke-jen tzu-liao pao-hu fa). [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
The judgment, issued on 20 May 2024 in the case of Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch), meticulously details why Dr. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 4:42 am
curid=8363375 Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Tom Mitcheson KC) Bionome Technology Ltd v Clearwater [2024] EWHC 3155 (Ch) (9 Dec 2024)This was an appeal from the decision of the Deputy Director of Patents, Huw Jones, sitting on behalf of the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks in an entitlement [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Ch.; 3/22), Vice Chancellor Slights was called upon to address a question of contract interpretation that I don’t recall seeing a Delaware court confront before – how should the Court analyze a buyer’s claim that it can refuse to close a deal based on an alleged breach […] [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:49 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) O’Dowd v R [2009] EWCA Crim 905 (12 May 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HR (Portugal) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2009] EWCA Civ 371 (05 May 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Mastercigars Direct Ltd. v Withers Llp [2009] EWHC 993 (Ch) (22 April 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
The principle in Presentaciones Musicales SA v Secunda [1994] Ch 271, that a claimant could ratify and adopt proceedings started in his name by a solicitor without authority, remained binding on the court.” WLR Daily, 26th April 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
Ch.; 1/22), the Chancery Court granted a protective order limiting the discovery that a company would be otherwise be required to provide to petitioners in an appraisal proceeding. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 12:45 pm
(in Follow the Money: Essays on International Taxation Introduction & Ch. 7 (Yale 2016) at Columbia today as part of its Davis Polk & Wardwell Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Alex... [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:24 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Port of London Authority v Ashmore [2009] EWHC 954 (Ch) (08 May 2009) High Court (Commercial Court) Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimiche Tunisien [2009] EWHC 963 (Comm) (11 May 2009) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Amaryllis Ltd v HM Treasury [2009] EWHC 962 (TCC) (08 May 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [...] [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Delaney v Chen & Anor [2010] EWHC 6 (Ch) (08 January 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Molnlycke Health Care Ab & Anor v BSN Medical Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 3370 (Pat) (17 December 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:59 am
In fact, a case prohibiting the use of KODAK for bicycles is an ancestor of dilution law, and gave rise to the “KODAK Doctrine”: Eastman Photographic Material v John Griffiths Cycle, 15 RPC 105 (Ch. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:22 am
Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc [2009] EWHC 77 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 22 “By entering into a ‘virtual assignment’ of leasehold office premises, under which all the economic benefits and burdens of the relevant lease, including any management responsibilities, were transferred to a third party, but without any actual assignment of the leasehold [...] [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
High Court (Commercial Division) Inta Navigation Ltd & Anor v Ranch Investments Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 1216 (Comm) (05 June 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Speciality Produce Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2009] EWHC 1245 (Admin) (05 June 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Dean v Burne & Ors [2009] EWHC 1250 (Ch) [...] [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Ch.; 6/24), the Chancery Court was recently called upon to interpret an asset purchase agreement’s working capital adjustment provision. [read post]
