Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 52,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 2:44 pm
I'm not even going to describe the facts of this kidnapping and sexual assault case. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 2:05 pm
Or at least not most of the reason why.Still, it doesn't help your domestic violence case -- or your attempt to appear sympathetic -- when the third charge to which you pled guilty was for "committing animal cruelty by killing a kitten. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:25 pm
The first of May brings us precisely such a case.The case concerns a man named Charles Brady, who lives on the streets of my very own San Diego. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
We don't want delusional people defending themselves. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:46 pm
This is another one of those cases -- this time, from the California Court of Appeal -- holding that it's totally okay for customs to look through the contents of your laptop at the border (here, at LAX) even without any reasonable suspicion of a crime. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:55 am
Kauffman might have told his client after the California Supreme Court's opinion in this case:"Robert, I've got some great news for you: I got your conviction reversed! [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
In a case brought by Rights of Women determined in February this year, the Court of Appeal concluded that Regulations made under LASPO requiring victims of domestic violence to satisfy onerous evidential requirements directed at establishing the necessary victimhood as a condition of a grant of legal aid, were contrary to the purpose of LASPO and unlawful (R (Rights of Women) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 91). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:24 pm
Four DePaul Law faculty members have signed a friend of the court brief in an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court in the case of People of the State of illinois v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:40 pm
Related Cases: Smith v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
The case of Carmer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
In the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J gave judgement on preliminary issues including in relation to “serious harm” in a number of libel actions brought against three newspapers and the Huffington Post. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
This was said to have caused harm, particularly to children and young people. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:33 am
Kidding aside, there is one civil case of significant interest next week, Burlingame v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Considerations of the possible impact of the Act on cases such as Dabrowski v Greeuw may reinforce those views. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Established by the Supreme Court in the 1993 case Daubert v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Established by the Supreme Court in the 1993 case Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
It's another child pornography case; there are a lot of these. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
The trial in the case of Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers in the High Court in London before Nicol J continued on Friday 15 July (Day 9), Monday 20 July (Day 10) and Tuesday 21 July (Day 11). [read post]
