Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 1001 - 1020 of 8,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 10:04 pm by Rumpole
Oral argument today at SCOTUS in Southern Union Company v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Eric Goldman
Many defendants will settle in this circumstance, at an inflated price, just to unlock their cash flow, i.e., they can’t let a $32 problem dictate the disposition of $150k+ of cash. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Next up is Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The Court of Appeals decision Thursday in the case of City of Gary v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
In its decision Wednesday in Kansas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
In light of evidence that a former nanny’s employers were aware of and disregarded federal and state minimum wage laws, sometimes paid her in cash, failed to record her hours, and made comments about her status as an alien, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a lower court erred that entered judgment as a matter of law against her (Davila v Menendez, June 10, 2013, Pryor, W). [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 8:05 pm by Nate Nead
Companies that generate a high level of cash flow attract leveraged buyout (LBO) transactions and become targets for private equity investors to purchase such companies. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:33 pm
Andrew Cuomo says women posing nearly naked for photos in Times Square [in exchange for cash from tourists] are breaking the law and undermining efforts to keep the tourist area family friendly…. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:30 pm
Eurodif, S.A. et al, together with No. 07-1078, USEC Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 7:44 am by Sader Law Firm
In a more challenging time to navigate these circumstances, small businesses, by their general nature, operate on thinner profit margins and smaller cash reserves than do larger corporations. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court’s judgment in favor of the employer was affirmed at to both claims (Fairchild v. [read post]