Search for: "Cass Sunstein" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 12:07 am by Glen Whitman
Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler characterize their “libertarian paternalist” approach as a “relatively weak and nonintrusive type of paternalism” that in its “most cautious forms . . . imposes trivial costs on those who seek to depart from the planner’s preferred option. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 7:05 pm by Steven Calabresi
" Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein wrote on October 4, 1998 in The Washington Post that mere lies about sex under oath were not in his view disqualifying behavior in a president of the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:18 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) It is common in the author footnote of law review articles — you know, the footnote that follows the author’s name that tells you who the author is — to thank people who have read drafts of the articles and offered comments to help improve it. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:13 pm
Updating this ILB entry from Jan. 8th, Tom Hamburger and Christi Parsons of the LA Times report today in a... [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm by NCC Staff
Cass Sunstein and a citizen’s guide to impeachment November 07, 2017: Despite intense interest in the subject, the constitutional process of impeachment is widely misunderstood. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:26 pm by Sandy Levinson
" One could also see such elements in the revival of "civic republicanism" that was an important part of the legal academy in the '80's (led by, among others, Cass Sunstein, who is now a leading member of the Obama Administration). [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:10 am by Rohit Nafday
Professors Tom Miles and Cass Sunstein, for instance, have studied a phenomenon that has come to be known as panel effects—briefly, that the political ideology of the judges who compose an appellate panel influences the outcome of the decision. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
  There's a very good, albeit rather ponderous study of punitive damages called "Punitive Damages, How Juries Decide," by Cass Sunstein and others. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:06 am by Kenneth Anderson
 Here at SSRN, and here is the abstract:In both constitutional law and public policy, Cass Sunstein’s work has entailed a search for the largest common denominator that justifies government action. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Amy Sinden
The phrase was originally coined by Cass Sunstein in a 2002 book by that name. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:43 pm
(4) Cass Sunstein--Most of the career academics who make these lists are completely implausible but there are reasons to think that Sunstein might be the exception that proves the rule. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As OIRA Administrator Cass Sunstein explains in a White House release: The new Executive Order will promote American exports, economic growth, and job creation by helping to eliminate unnecessary regulatory differences between the United States and other countries and by making sure that we do not create new ones. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:40 pm by Penn Program on Regulation
  That is the question Representative John Sullivan (R-OK) presumably had in mind when, at a recent hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, he asked Cass Sunstein, Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), what “this gobbledygook” about “equity, human dignity, fairness and distributive impacts” means. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:53 pm by Kenneth Anderson
” Long before reading Cass Sunstein as a risk-expert, I read him as a jurisprudential philosophe. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 7:48 am
A few brief notes: As with Cass Sunstein's famous 1989 article Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory Age, Scott and Sturm's very interesting piece also raises the question of whether 'new' settings for judicial review - 'the regulatory age' for Sunstein, 'new governance' for Scott and Sturm - represent new, qualitatively different conditions and challenges for courts or whether they are better understood as institutional and… [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:47 am by John J. Donohue III
” Of course, Stevens was correct and Justice Scalia supported his assertion with a cite to a single article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule that was not an empirical evaluation of the deterrent effect of the death penalty, but rather a philosophical discussion of what would be appropriate policy if the death penalty did deter. [read post]