Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
” Talbot v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am
Indeed, one of the weaknesses in current law is that the governor’s certification serves as a sort of “tiebreaker” if more than one slate of electors is sent to Congress and the chambers disagree as to which to count. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:11 am
& Ors v HX Investments Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 708 (31 May 2012) Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 729 (30 May 2012) De Brito & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 709 (30 May 2012) QEB Metallics Ltd v Peerzada & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 728 (30 May 2012) AL (Albania) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 710 (30 May 2012) HM Revenue and Customs… [read post]
14 May 2021, 10:25 am
Volkman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:30 pm
Miles Medical Co v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Assn. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175, 186; Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Assn. v State of New York, 75 NY2d 175, 186; Matter of Trupiano v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Bica, and a decision by the Justices just last Term, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People… [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 8:05 pm
”)] Roger Pilon on NLRB v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:47 pm
When it injected poison into the veins of William Earl Lynd, the state of Georgia restarted the machinery of death, which came to a halt as states awaited a decision in Baze v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Note that the order in which I just stated the parties is Appellant v. [read post]
