Search for: "Clear v. United States of America" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Inequitable Conduct To prove inequitable conduct, Hyundai must provide clear and convincing evidence of (1) affirmative misrepresentations of a material fact, failure to disclose material information, or submission of false material information and (2) an intent to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
  The only criteria was that an adult, one single adult, whose judgment in such matters is given near absolute deference though it's subject to no tests or challenge in anticipation or preparation for making such a decision, decided that it was a good idea.Imagine that, finding nothing hidden in undergarments or on the surface of your child's genitalia, your child was then subject to being probed and exposed in their genital cavities.Imagine that there was nothing, absolutely… [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:15 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm by Eva Arevuo
 This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
  "Democracy was an adequate enough framework to form the United States of America," said Healey, although you could argue it also took a couple of wars to do that, "[and] it should be an adequate enough framework to decide" this dispute. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
[filed May 4, 2012]IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION,Plaintiffs, v.UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,Defendants. ))))) Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00243-) RLW) (J udge Robert L. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHWARTZ, Defendants.09-CV-2271(JS)(GRB)     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK     2012 U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]