Search for: "Cohen v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Joshua Matz
”  Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic provides “5 quick takes” on the federal government’s brief. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:43 am
Pham, Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter DefenseHenri C. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 3:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Pre-Petition claims are different from post-petition claims, yet they all came together in Horvath v Budin, Reisman, Kupferberg & Bernstein  LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 30105(U) January 13, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 161339/2019 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  2021 NY Slip Op 30429(U) February 12, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153713/2020 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
 In a report we released last year, we outlined why the reasoning underlying these laws is constitutionally suspect: In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Aside from various procedural arguments, Cohen argued that the amended complaint failed to state a viable claim against him because it lacked any allegation that Cohen personally received a distribution of any money or assets of LiveLive. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Katie Cohen
Although the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793; see e.g. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Presumably, this rule would not apply to directors who have obtained written releases, but the Sacha Baron Cohen’s of the world should be concerned about this. [read post]