Search for: "Consumer Law Center LLC"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
Outside funding: Less than $1M in outside funding DocStyle LLC Founded: 10/12/2018. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
For more information, visit Medina Law Group or Private Client Capital Group. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:02 pm
She is a fierce consumer advocate and ICOs represent a significant threat to consumers and every day main street investors. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
The concerns go well beyond the post-event legal consequences, such as regulatory notifications, requests and investigations; law enforcement interactions; vendor disputes and lawsuits; and potential consumer class actions. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
Urban Gorilla, LLC, 2010 WL 5395065 (D. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:25 pm
Banks Ted Banks is counsel to the law firm of Schoeman Updike Kaufman & Scharf: www.schoeman.com and President of Compliance & Competition Consultants, LLC: www.complianceconsultants.com). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:54 pm
Banks Ted Banks is counsel to the law firm of Schoeman Updike Kaufman & Scharf: www.schoeman.com and President of Compliance & Competition Consultants, LLC: www.complianceconsultants.com). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Creative Artists Agency, LLC, 72 Cal. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 1:54 pm
At the center of the analytics story this year has been LexisNexis. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
What precisely renders an event material has plagued securities lawyers for years and has been the subject of countless judicial decisions, SEC enforcement actions, law review articles, law firm guidance and the like – but can be effectively summed up as any important development or event that “a reasonable investor would consider important to an investment decision. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
The Sixth Circuit addressed one of the most significant issues of current prescription medical product liability, innovator liability, under the laws of no fewer than 22 states. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Thus, the Toner decision consistently seems to go out of its way to make the comment k defense as costly and time consuming as possible.As for negligence, while the Toner court held that comment k did not “literally” apply (it being a comment to strict liability), the same general principles were the same in negligence law:In a general sense, however, the comment k concerns and its required balancing between risks and benefits are similar to those involved in a negligence… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 11:40 am
Consumer Innovations LLC.] [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Notably, none of the plaintiffs mentions common-law sovereign immunity, which may provide an independent source of immunity to foreign officials (who are not covered by the FSIA). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In the decade since we brought our first crypto enforcement actions, our approach has been consistent, principled, and tethered to the federal securities laws and legal precedent. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Memo to Clarke: requesting and reviewing public records is tedious and time-consuming, and certainly not the way to score an easy scoop. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
On September 15, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court will sit in Houston, TX (University of Houston Law Center) to hear oral argument on whether a payday lender may divert a class action filed against it over its practice of pursuing the collection of defaulted civil debts through criminal prosecution with bad-debt affidavits in violation of Texas law. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Woodland, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
(C.D.Cal., Sep. 22, 2014) also finding a common law performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings; and Capital Records, LLC v Sirius XM Radio, Inc (Sup.Ct.Cal. [read post]
