Search for: "Corpus v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
"The case is Elfgeeh v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
United States 3)Magwood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am
After Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am
After Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
Broom claimed that he did have good cause for not presenting the records in the state courts: the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in State ex rel Steckman v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 10:44 pm
I.M. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
Circuit] has protested that the result is that there is very little left of the Supreme Court's historic ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 12:38 pm
The English Court of Appeal case of R v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Washington (2004)), and a similar issue in the federal guidelines system (United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:46 pm
Mayton v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 4:33 pm
Lis v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am
The rulings are: In United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
” Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the East Valley Tribune) discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:12 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Anthony Bernard Chandler v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
The Teague, §2254(d), and Pinholster rules, if fully enforced, would make initial federal habeas corpus proceedings short in most cases, as the state court decision on the state court record is almost always reasonable, and new claims and evidence should not be allowed absent a miscarriage of justice (i.e., innocence of the crime). [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:36 am
In 1996, Congress decided that habeas corpus actions challenging the decisions of a state criminal court must be denied unless the state court violated clearly-established law. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
In 1968, James DeAnda, a long-time Mexican rights attorney, brought a case against the Corpus Christi Independent School District (CCISD) on behalf of Mexican American and African American parents protesting the inferior conditions of schools available to their children in Corpus Christi [Cisneros v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
” The access of defendants to federal habeas corpus proceedings, the report asserts, is also too limited. [read post]
