Search for: "County v. Johnson*"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
Dist. (1970); see also Kistler v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:24 am
Apr 28, 2009) (NO. 439)Bernard V. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:56 pm
Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
In Fulton County, the parties amassed nearly 1 million in legal fees arguing over custody of their child. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, County of Chautauqua Unit 6300, Chautauqua County Local 807, 8 NY3d 513, 519 [2007] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
A natural-gas pipeline exploded in Johnson County, Texas, on June 7, 2010. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Fox v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
Lake County Department of Child Services (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (4): Anthony Logan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
In one of the higher profile civil appeals before the Virginia Supreme Court in the past year, On March 4, 2011 the Justices relieved the petitioners who filed the case of Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Spencer respond to questions from the Chief Justice during last week’s oral arguments in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Montgomery County v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
There had been a suggestion in the County Court (HB v Haringey LBC – noted by NL in the second case here) that it was necessary to define vulnerable, but Rose J took the opposite view, at [35]: I consider that Tetteh remains good law post Hotak so that the review decision cannot be faulted because it failed to define ‘vulnerable’ or ‘significantly’ or failed to list the attributes of the ordinary person if made homeless. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Generally, such claims are regarded as unripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
Sivit v. [read post]
