Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 1001 - 1020 of 16,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2017, 1:41 pm by James Hastings
  What happens when a trademark application is opposed and then the Opposer does not follow the rules? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:41 pm by James Hastings
  What happens when a trademark application is opposed and then the Opposer does not follow the rules? [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:37 am by Chad Jimenez
The amount subject to garnishment was previously the lesser of 25% of disposable earnings or 30 times the minimum wage. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:25 pm
- Late fees or fees for other violations can't be more than $25, unless it's a repeated violation or it costs the credit card company more than $25 to handle the problem [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:06 am
The Instapundit post happened 2:24, 25 October 2018, more than 30 hours later.This is the one time I've stopped to take a closer look at the complaints about suppressing the "Gosnell" film, and I am unlikely to put time into this again, because this was a case of crying wolf. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
For a single Defendant, the filing fee is $25 plus an additional fee, called "mileage." [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:15 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
January 2, 2008)(Ray, J.) the Bankruptcy Court was given the opportunity to interpret new section 222.25(4), Florida Statutes which allows a debtor to exempt personal property not to exceed $4,000 if he does not "claim or receive the benefits of a homestead exemption under s. 4, Art. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:15 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
January 2, 2008)(Ray, J.) the Bankruptcy Court was given the opportunity to interpret new section 222.25(4), Florida Statutes which allows a debtor to exempt personal property not to exceed $4,000 if he does not "claim or receive the benefits of a homestead exemption under s. 4, Art. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm by or
Similarly, it cites T 39/82, T 142/84, T 332/90, T 485/91 and T 25/97 for supporting that a new application of a known measure cannot lead to an inventive step if the problem does not change.The above cannot lead to the Board to exceptionally admit the evidence relating to the alleged public prior use of its own motion in the appeal proceedings.In assessing whether it qualifies as closest prior art, also the function of the guide has to be taken into account. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 7:06 am by Adam Sandler
While the Act does not state that no more than 40% of total amount of loan forgiveness may be attributed to non-payroll costs like the old 75/25 rule, can we safely assume that will be the case? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
11:00a-12:00p IGRA at 25 and a Discussion of the Michigan v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 10:04 pm by Marcel Pemsel
Further, Art. 8(5) EUTMR does not require the goods and services to be similar. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:07 am by Arina Shulga
With regard to the equity provisions, the “less than 25%” of equity which does not have to be held by licensed professional employees must, in the alternative, be held by non-professional employees and/or an ESOP. [read post]