Search for: "Davies v. United States" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Fall is back, and, in the United States, that means pumpkin-flavored products and (American) football galore. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:55 am by Jennifer Davis
” Treaty Between the United States and the Six Nations Signed at Konondaigua, New York, with the Instrument of Ratification Signed by President George Washington and Secretary of State Edmund Randolph on January 21, 1795 [IDA Treaties Explorer, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12013254 ]Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Davis and capital resentencing case McKinney v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am by SHG
Remember how cool it was when the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
The clause states that “[t]he United States District Court for the District of Oregon may enter judgment upon any award, either by confirming the award or by vacating, modifying or correcting the award. [read post]
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]