Search for: "Davis v. People" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am by Sarnata Reynolds
The Supreme Court struck indefinite detention down as an affront to liberty in Zadvydas v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm by Jon Sands
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:58 pm by Lisa McElroy
Sometime similar happened to Willie Gene Davis, the petitioner in Davis v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 18 June 2014, there was a CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston before Nicola Davies J. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:36 pm
And much as it must pain them, this precludes them from being yes men for the Bush administration at the expense of the rule of law.Slate concludes that the military commissions are as good as doomed:If the same people who joined the military in the hopes of fighting terrorism have had enough of the government's jury-rigged apparatus of Guantánamo justice, it's probably time to stick a fork in the whole thing.Meanwhile, stay tuned in the next month for the Supreme … [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And as Buckley points out, the case that presented the greatest challenge in this regard was Confederate President Jefferson Davis’s treason prosecution.The Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]