Search for: "Davis v. Texas"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
He has just begun appealing his conviction and sentence.The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:29 pm
Our usual batch of news today is complemented by another few posts detailing the outcome of Miller v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:29 am
Davis L. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
#15: Nutramax Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:53 am
For the uninitiated, Garcetti v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), does not authorize the continued and potentially indefinite detention of a removable alien based on a determination by the government that the alien's mental illness renders him a dangerous risk to the community. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:43 am
The City of Waco argued that liability was precluded under the Texas Supreme Court’s precedents Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:12 am
L & H Concepts LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 241-3464 Fax: (314) 371-0000 E-mail: mogoodwill@mo-goodwill.org Web: http://www.mersgoodwill.org Healthcare Family Voices Missouri Sarah Zerr Phone: (816) 455-2977 E-mail: shzkcmo@aol.com The state's Title V agency will soon have a Family Advisory Council, led by a parent facilitator, who provide information and support to parent groups in Missouri, and will also ensure the family perspective and input on major Title V decisions affecting… [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
The Schwab case represents the latest showdown over whether pending executions should be postponed until after the Supreme Court has heard and decided the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:07 pm
z4 Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
In Hall v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:12 am
Frazier v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Davis & Davis, P.C., 69 SW 3d 268, 274 [Tex App, Austin 2002]). [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 8:19 pm
Meanwhile, and in utter disregard of the principle of equality under law, the State of Texas is refusing to apply the principles and decision of Mexico v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
The Indians lost to Texas only by 21-13 and had more total offense and more first downs than the Longhorns. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and Texas Department of Community Affairs v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
Hill v. [read post]
