Search for: "Discovery Communications Inc"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Greyhound, Inc., No. 1167 EDA 2015, 2016 Pa. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
, b) the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Community Bank of Raymore, 14-520. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
After the plaintiffs’ repeated failures to comply with discovery requests and their supposed lack of cooperation with their lawyers in handling the case, the attorneys communicated their intent to withdraw as counsel as permitted under Maryland Rule 2-132(b). [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:23 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
This `simply calls for enough facts to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of’ the necessary element. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:49 am
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc., No. 4:15-cv-01096-NCC, 2016 WL 1594453 (E.D. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:00 am
Discovery Communications Inc. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
You’d find the evidence of inducement in discovery. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Applicable Legal Standards Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am
COM, 2016 NY Slip Op 26112 https://t.co/KpHhgdHgca -> Kid-friendly Kik app gives predators direct online access to children -> Baidu signs agreement to reduce online IP infringement -> Communication to the public in copyright law – the German struggle with the CJEU concept -> Dog poo + Facebook = $65,000 -> Scholarly Publishing Has Its Napster Moment https://t.co/k4xh7hNEGl -> U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
Understandably frustrated by this discovery the condominium owners, through the Landmark Towers Association, Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
Understandably frustrated by this discovery the condominium owners, through the Landmark Towers Association, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Following the important decision by the European Court of Justice in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (2014), which found a “right to be forgotten” in the European Data Protection Directive, it is natural to ask if there is an equivalent or similar right to be forgotten in Canada. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:08 pm
The decision in Mayo came as a shock to patent practitioners and the inventive community. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am
The process of evaluating the adequacy of current arrangement and considering the advisability of changes to tighten existing practices in many cases will result in the discovery and discussion of potentially sensitive information about the adequacy of current or past compliance with the Privacy Rules or other matters. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am
The process of evaluating the adequacy of current arrangement and considering the advisability of changes to tighten existing practices in many cases will result in the discovery and discussion of potentially sensitive information about the adequacy of current or past compliance with the Privacy Rules or other matters. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
The statements on any recordings or communications that Al Jazeera plans to air are absolutely false and incorrect. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies, fulfillment of a confusing constellation of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
Brown Jordan Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
