Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that Justice Benjamin ought to have recused himself in the case Caperton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The proposed changes to Regulation II under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act would also change the amounts that bank card issuers subject to the rule can charge to cover fraud costs and to counter fraud losses. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:20 am
Supreme Court’s July 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission In the fall, the SEC and CFTC published their annual reports on their whistleblower programs, which were created by the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010.[19] The SEC and CFTC programs cover information about violations of the federal securities laws and Commodity Exchange Act, respectively. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
Cheerleading as a Sport under Title IX Approximately half of the U.S. states have already recognized high school cheerleading under Title IX.[11] Cheerleading has grown significantly in popularity among women, almost 25%, since 2000.[12] Cheerleading’s largest barrier to achieving… [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
The stated purpose of the CRARA was to "improve ratings quality for the protection of investors and in the public interest by fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
In fact, many of the challenges and the conundrums presented by Section 404 rules were not fully appreciated until those issues surfaced again in subsequent statutes, such as the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 and the JOBS Act of 2012. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am
And finally, on June 20, 2011 the Court held in the Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:17 am
In addition, aggrieved investors in failed or troubled privately held banks also filed a variety of other lawsuits, primarily in state courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
” The firm agreed to pay approximately $166 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and an $83 million civil penalty to resolve the SEC’s charges; FirstEnergy Corp. for a multi-year political corruption scheme in which FirstEnergy and affiliates made payments to an entity controlled by a state legislator in exchange for official action benefitting FirstEnergy. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
”[5] The Act does not provide a minimum period to receive comments on rule proposals.[6]But, a comment period of at least 60 days has been endorsed by the Administrative Conference of the United States for significant regulatory actions.[7] Further, executive orders issued by multiple past presidents from both political parties have all recognized the importance of a minimum 60-day comment period.[8] During the past four years, a significant number of proposals had comment periods… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
” Now, as to why robo-signing only seems to be a serious prosecutable crime in the State of Nevada? [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
