Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 5,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
§ 211B.11, subd. 1 provides, in relevant part as follows:Soliciting near polling places. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Before the trial, Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-4-106(d)(5) governs and provides in pertinent part: An injunction restraining both parties from relocating any children of the parties outside the state of Tennessee, or more than one hundred (100) miles from the marital home, without the permission of the other party or an order of the court, except in the case of a removal based upon a well-founded fear of physical abuse against either the fleeing parent… [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
Bakshi Inderjeet Singh, (2005) 1 SCC 598; Manicka Poosali (Deceased by L.Rs.) [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 1:26 am
This section reveals that the court does not understand what "third-party standing" means. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
In the District Court, the parties had two principle disputes regarding the amount in controversy requirements. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:30 pm
He does so without applying the Bauman factors (prejudice, clear error, etc.) that generally govern such relief, holding that "Bauman does not apply in the extraordinary case where the petitioner claims erroneous deprivation of a jury trial. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:08 am
“100% Pure” and “Sourced, Formulated, . . . and Guaranteed to be the Highest Quality Available”: “Particularly in the context of health supplements, a claim that something is ‘100% Pure’ is a measurable statement of fact…. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:04 pm
That said, it does seem clear that super-injunctions are almost extinct. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:04 am
Hawaii Tourism Auth., 100 Haw. 242, 250, 59 P.3d 877, 885 (2002). [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:04 am
Hawaii Tourism Auth., 100 Haw. 242, 250, 59 P.3d 877, 885 (2002). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Janssen alleges that it has paid approximately $100 million in duties for entries of darunavir ethanolate that should have received duty-free treatment. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
To sue for breach of contract, the employer must show: 1. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:17 am
The company also sold through third-party websites, including prominent retailers like urbanoutfitters.com, nordstrom.com, and aerie.com, providing third parties with marketing materials used to market and sell Truly Organic products. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:20 am
(1) He did not register before the infringement began, so he was not eligible for statutory damages or attorneys’ fees. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:04 pm
” The parties in Lawson all agreed that the $50 and $100 citations permitted by section 558 are civil penalties, which could be recovered in a PAGA action. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
The Order directs the Secretary of Agriculture to prepare a report concerning IP laws and seeds and other inputs: to help ensure that the intellectual property system, while incentivizing innovation, does not also unnecessarily reduce competition in seed and other input markets beyond that reasonably contemplated by the Patent Act (see 35 U.S.C. 100 et seq. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
The Order directs the Secretary of Agriculture to prepare a report concerning IP laws and seeds and other inputs: to help ensure that the intellectual property system, while incentivizing innovation, does not also unnecessarily reduce competition in seed and other input markets beyond that reasonably contemplated by the Patent Act (see 35 U.S.C. 100 et seq. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
How likely are you to see a person in a Santa suit between January 1 and November 1? [read post]
