Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 6:28 am
Thus, only if a statute authorizes closure, can a governmental entity withhold official records from the citizen. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 4:28 pm
This point was recently driven home in the June, 2014 Miami, Florida case, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious… [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:04 pm
Cal. 2011), and U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
” The section then defines an “Exchange” as an entity that necessarily has been established by a state: “An Exchange shall be a governmental agency or nonprofit entity that is established by a State. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
“Person” is a defined term: “any individual, partnership, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, government or governmental subdivision or agency, or other entity. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Reed v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:57 am
Bubb v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
Were the law otherwise, the Court observed, “a host of workers who receive payments from a governmental entity for some sort of service would be candidates for inclusion within Abood’s reach. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am
Harris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
The fact that EPA’s greenhouse-gas-inclusive interpretation of the PSD and Title V triggers would place plainly excessive demands on limited governmental resources is alone a good reason for rejecting it; but that is not the only reason. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
• Does the government control the entity? [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:19 pm
Under sovereign immunity, governmental entities may be immune from lawsuits arising from the negligence of their employees. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm
And Title V does the same with various national security letter statutes, thereby preventing any of these laws from being used for bulk collection. [read post]
