Search for: "Does 1 -10"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 120,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
§ 3553(f )(1) The Court answered that question "yes," holding that a defendant has to check every box to lose eligibility. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:10 am
Indeed, the Court finds that the passage of time does not, by default, deprive this Court of declaratory judgment jurisdiction since the relevant circumstances of this case have not changed despite the passage of time. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:27 pm
Does anyone know what the right explanation is? [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:54 pm
This has three key implications for unit level franchisees: 1. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:34 am
Does 1-14, the University of Arizona has responded to the RIAA's subpoena, but its response describes in detail why the subpoena response cannot be relied upon to identify any alleged infringer. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:09 am
On March 1, 2019, EERE BETO announced a funding opportunity of up to $51.5 million for new and innovative research technologies for trucks, off-road vehicles, and the fuels that power them. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:11 am
Hollander, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a fee-shifting bylaw did not apply to a former stockholder’s challenge to the fairness of a 10,000-to-1 reverse stock split that the corporation undertook in connection with a going-private transaction because (i) the bylaw was adopted after the stockholder’s interest in the corporation ceased to exist due to the reverse stock split and (ii) Delaware law does not authorize a bylaw that regulates the rights or powers of… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:55 am
Call us today at 1-800-852-5211 or request your free consultation. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:56 am
§160(a)(1)-(3). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:56 am
[Defendant] does not demonstrate, as it must, that such conduct was unreasonable under the circumstances. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:56 am
§160(a)(1)-(3). [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 8:01 am
The exclusionary rule does not apply to alien removal proceedings. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 5:50 am
Reading Miranda warnings does not turn a consensual stop into a seizure. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:38 am
While the Louisiana seatbelt statute does not permit a search of a car based on a stop for that, there were other justifications for the officer having reasonable suspicion defendant might be armed and justifying a frisk of the car. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:12 am
Also, the fact the PO that came was not defendant’s regular PO does not make it unreasonable, either. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:05 am
Texting while driving does not support a search incident. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:41 am
Bell, Jr.706-259-2586 Disclaimer: While this article does contain some facts, it is mainly my opinion. [read post]
25 May 2019, 1:43 pm
District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam, who was appointed by former President Obama, issued the order, which does not fully halt construction but would limit additional border fencing to specific areas. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:08 am
What Does PIP Cover? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:51 pm
Medical marijuana advocates and criminal defense lawyers argue that the mere presence of these metabolites does not equate to intoxication or impairment. [read post]
