Search for: "Does 1-30" Results 1001 - 1020 of 27,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am by Jessica Kroeze
"Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 reads as follows:"A control arrangement (100; 200) for an elevator brake (10), comprising a control circuit (110; 210) adapted to generate, according to a demand for releasing a first braking member (14) of said elevator brake (10), a first actuating signal and to generate, according to a demand for releasing a second braking member (16) of said elevator brake (10), a second actuating signal; a first terminal (112; 212) for outputting said… [read post]
On May 30, 2018, Vermont Governor Phil Scott signed bill H.707, titled “An Act Relating to the Prevention of Sexual Harassment” (the “Act”). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:08 am by Jamie Markham
The law was in effect for offenses committed from July 1, 1981 to September 30, 1994, and it continues to apply to offenses committed during that date range. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:41 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Claim 1 for a dishwasher in this opposition appeal comprises the feature that either said bottom wall (14) or said cover (12) incorporating a first and a second half-conduit (28, 30) tapering at respective ends facing each other, so that they form an air gap device, The opponent objected that the patent does not sufficiently disclose such incorporated half-conduits. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 3:58 pm
The Regulations will be retroactive to January 1, 2001. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:10 pm by Kristen Matteucci
”) shows that each of the 30 local jurisdictions meet that criteria. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:48 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
In 2016, the cap is $2.20 million, for acts of malpractice that occurred between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 (Va. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:44 am by K&L Gates
Sept. 30, 2011) In this case, the court ruled that the Federal Prompt Payment Act (31 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
Government agents violated the search protocol by not timely searching the defendant’s computers, but the court does not find that the search should be suppressed as a result because there was no “but for” causation. [read post]