Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 1001 - 1020 of 4,679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States (156 U.S. 51, 1895), the Supreme Court held that the constitutional right to jury trial does not give a jury the right to decide questions of law or to reject the law as presented to it by the court. [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:36 am by Gene Quinn
Almost two months ago, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
Tomorrow, the first Monday in October, begins the new term of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation et al. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 7:43 am by McKennon Law Group
The District Court determined that Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA) abused its discretion by denying long-term disability benefits to a former community relations manager at Republic Services, a firm that provides waste disposal services across the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:23 am by Beth Graham
A United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit panel has issued an interesting ruling in a case involving arbitration. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Joe Wallin
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Keilholtz, 268 F.R.D at 336 (finding class definition that included persons who lived in the United States who own a home in which the disputed product was installed after a particular date was not subjective or imprecise); Chavez v. [read post]