Search for: "ELLIS v ELLIS" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 2:37 pm
You know, the one who set up the A/V equipment and was a whiz-kid with all things computer related? [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:00 pm by shkim
   Facebook Messages Subject to CAN-SPAM In other Facebook news, a district court in California recently ruled that in-platform messages sent by an online marketer through Facebook constituted “commercial electronic mail messages,” subject to CAN-SPAM (Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:43 am by Susan Brenner
[and asked if Davis] of Ellis Mathews rented a room at the motel. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:17 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Amanda Ellis provided a wonderful guest lecture on the topic of Getting Hired Using Social Networking. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
JL:  There are a number of important cases pending, but if I had to name one I think it is Microsoft v. i4i. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since he failed to show that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of her legal malpractice cause of action (see Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650, 651; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d 789, 790; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578,… [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
In Marilyn Ellis v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, the plaintiff Marilyn Ellis with her California disability attorney contended that she was at all times a participant to a group long term disability plan with the policy number 63311 that was provided by the Sun Life Assurance Company (Sun Life). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 5:27 am by SHG
” In other words, he just made up his own rules for determining that a defendant was intellectually suited for death, since the Supreme Court's Atkins v. [read post]