Search for: "Edwards v. Super*"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Indiana v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:57 am
Attorneys for Appellee, Jim Gonzalez: Edward O. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:01 pm
As regular readers know, China Law Blog loves the Danone-Wahaha dispute, having written the following posts on it: -- China's Joint Venture Jeopardy -- Danone v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:00 pm
Obama and Edwards and Richardson had handbills handed out in Detroit. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:14 am
Barg, a/k/a Francis Edward Barg); andSaid that the rapid, natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood creates a single-factor exigent circumstance that will justify the police taking a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw from a defendant, provided that the police have probable cause to believe that defendant committed criminal vehicular homicide or operation (State v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
Prosecutors, like judges, must be free to do their jobs without fear of being sued later, the high court said in the case of Imbler v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
The conference was chaired by Edward Coleman of Surrett & Coleman of Augusta, Georgia and opening remarks were also made by Kurt Kegel of Davis Matthews and Quigley in Atlanta, Chair of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Metz v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:34 pm
Unfortunately for the employee in a recent case, Webb-Edwards v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Lipstadt (Holocaust denier ) is all on internet State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
V. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Arizona, 384 U.S. 43 (1966), and Edwards v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:21 pm
“Through the trial the defendants demonstrated a failure to accept the claim construction governing this case. . . . they essentially urged the jury to adopt an interpretation of the patent claims developed by their experts instead of the construction mandated by the Federal Circuit,” wrote Judge Edward Harrington, ordering a $10 million penalty plus some attorneys fees against Medtronic, in Depuy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:49 pm
NY Times: McCain v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 10:59 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (7): Edward A. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 7:24 pm
Acknowledging the importance of federal FLSA regulations in the analysis of the exempt duties under California law, the court had no trouble upholding the trial court's determination that Combs spent over 50% of his time on exempt, administrative duties, and that he had therequisite discretion and independent judgment.The case is Combs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
