Search for: "FORD v. UNITED STATES" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(Class 46) Reminiscences on ‘i Intel’ (Class 46)   Portugal Portugal makes extra-budgetary contribution to WIPO capacity building projects (WIPO)   Spain The Princess and the Trade Mark Office - High Court of Catalunya overturns SPTO refusal of Spanish trade mark applications for Letizia de Giorgi marks (Class 46)   United Kingdom Professor Adrian Sterling’s orphan works scheme (IPKat) Movie industry: London ‘fake-free… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
Bob Holycross, Ford’s Chief Sustainability Officer, commented that the new rule is a “landmark standard that will define clean transportation and set an example for the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
But one state judge held in September 2006 that it was unconstitutional, asserting in Graham v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
United States is cited in the following article: Anna Roberts, Arrests as Guilt, 70 Ala. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America and no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:35 am by Ad Law Defense
”  Organic Consumers Association et al v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
United States law determines this by considering: (1) whether the accused infringer actually had access to the original work; and (2) whether the accused infringing work is “substantially similar” to the original work. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach (that the law abhors a forfeiture) was the rule. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Matt Ford discusses the “11th-hour curveball” created by the allegations of copying. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Michael Stern
Although the PRA declares that “[t]he United States shall receive and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records,” it does not provide all executive officials with unfettered access to such records. [read post]