Search for: "French v. French"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 5,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 5:12 am
No. 22535 SEC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:12 am
No. 22535 SEC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
In the case of Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:28 pm
According to the report (see below) of the French ombudsman(mediateur de la Republique) and the French NHRI (CNCDH), the new remedy lacks effectiveness as asylum seekers who are denied entry, are detained and have only 48 hours to file their appeal (case Ma. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 5:03 pm
Happi v France 9/4/15 (judgement in French only) Mr H lives with his family in unsatisfactory and hazardous accommodation in Paris. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:00 am
Canadian Robert V. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:19 pm
STL recently highlighted a German-language trademark law blog and a French-language trademark law blog that English readers can now access through the wonders of Google and Yahoo! [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
But the district court's holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:17 pm
Without proof of such allegations, I would think any prosecution for fraud in this country would violate the First Amendment under an old case, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:57 pm
Mais ils restent débiteurs de la vérité. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:56 pm
Hermès is a French luxury goods manufacturer whose handbags and purses are highly coveted. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Moncur v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
McAuley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 5:43 pm
Following up on an earlier blog posting, we note that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused leave to appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in Shell Canada Limited v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Del Giudice v. [read post]
