Search for: "GORDON v GORDON"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 5:11 am
Virginia Jahrke v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:41 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am
, 119 AD2d 789 [1986]; see also Wiggin v Gordon, 115 Misc. 2d 1071 [1982]), or for misconduct that is chronic. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
A property owner is subject to liability for a defective condition on its premises if a plaintiff demonstrates that the owner either created the alleged defect or had actual or constructive notice of it (see Betz v Daniel Conti, Inc., 69 AD3d 545, 545; Roy v City of New York, 65 AD3d 1030, 1031; see also Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 10:18 am
"Gordon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:14 am
Marcia Del ReyGroup 34: (open seat)Renee Gordon v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:53 am
Using the Gordon & Breach Science Publishers v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 10:52 pm
Wyman-Gordon Inv. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:53 am
The 4th then cites to Judge Anstead’s special concurrence in Gordon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
See, e.g., Gordon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:12 am
Defendant “may not shift to the client the legal responsibility it was specifically hired to undertake” (Escape Airports [USA], Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, 79 AD3d 437, 439 [1st Dept 2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
These factual allegations, as supplemented by plaintiffs’ papers in opposition to defendant attorney’s dismissal motion, sufficiently alleged a legal malpractice claim (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]; Escape Airports [USA], Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, 79 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 am
Gordon and Daniel Sharfstein are here; table of contents, here. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:04 am
Contrast Effie Film, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:01 pm
#winning [TMZ] * Gordon from Sesame Street lost his palimony case. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:44 am
Gordon v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:22 am
Determining eligibility for accidental disability benefits Mruczek v McCall, 299 AD2d 638, Steven v McCall,** The Mruczek Case: The Mruczek decision demonstrates the burden an individual has in proving that he or she is eligible for accidental disability benefits or line of duty disability benefits. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
Marshals Service related to his arrest and forced witness testimony before the military commission trying U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:31 am
Saskatchewan law firm McKercher LLP should have obtained its client’s consent before agreeing to represent an employee suing the company the firm was already working for on a variety of cases.In Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
