Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 5,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Notes:The decision does not say why the officers believed the gun was illegal. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
The Supreme Court ruled that it does. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm
Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:43 am
The case was Patrick Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:25 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
The police conducted a protective sweep of the premises and then went back in and looked for evidence, finding a gun under a sweatshirt. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:42 am
Here is the opinion: Worth v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:49 am
In Altman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 5:03 am
Likewise, see U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
Lott’s suit alleges that Levitt defamed him in his recent book Freakonomics by suggesting that Lott’s research on the relation between guns and crime could not be “replicated” by other scholars and in a subsequent email to an economist suggesting that Lott had paid $15,000 to the Journal of Law & Economics to publish in a special issue a series of articles supporting Lott’s views on guns. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:52 am
Facts: This case (Hunters Run Gun Club, LLC et al v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:41 am
The district court suppressed the evidence in question, a gun, and the government appealed. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
Stone, Hudson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:57 pm
(David Kopel) Earlier today, I filed an amicus brief in Woollard v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am
See Caetano v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
REMEMBER, under Brendlin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:33 pm
Where the meaning is evident, the court does not need to look at other interpretation according to Shannon v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
The Fifth Circuit vacated Appellant's sentence because, unlike some other escape charges, leaving a halfway house does not require overcoming physical barriers or evading security, for example, and therefore does not present a serious potential risk of physical injury to others. 9. [read post]
