Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Walker and Lady Hale gave the lead judgment. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Starting on Monday 7 November is Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust, which is scheduled for 2-3 days to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance and Dyson. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Tuesday 1 November Lords Hale, Kerr and Wilson will hear Joseph Lennox Holmes v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Lady Hale, the only female Justice, has certainly been vocal of late. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:12 am
The Supreme Court website says of Lady Hale that “A home maker as well as a judge, she thoroughly enjoyed helping the artists and architects create a new home for The Supreme Court”. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:12 am
The Supreme Court website says of Lady Hale that “A home maker as well as a judge, she thoroughly enjoyed helping the artists and architects create a new home for The Supreme Court”. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:48 pm
The Supreme Court website says of Lady Hale that “A home maker as well as a judge, she thoroughly enjoyed helping the artists and architects create a new home for The Supreme Court”. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:00 am
In last week’s case (Hale v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
A two day appeal in the Privy Council starting on Tuesday 25 October will be heard by Lady Hale, Lords Walker and Clarke, Sir Paul Girran and Sir Terence Etherton. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
A two day appeal in the Privy Council starting on Tuesday 25 October will be heard by Lady Hale, Lords Walker and Clarke, Sir Paul Girran and Sir Terence Etherton. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Grumbine Hale v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Lady Hale adopted a different approach, noting that the ECtHR had traditionally drawn a distinction between the positive (allowing family reunion) and negative (not expelling a family member) aspects of Article 8. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Lady Hale adopted a different approach, noting that the ECtHR had traditionally drawn a distinction between the positive (allowing family reunion) and negative (not expelling a family member) aspects of Article 8. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP argued the case for Joel Judulang. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
Law Lessons from Lee v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
Rozenberg's article speculates that Lord Neuberger - presently Master of the Rolls - would be in line to become the court's next President, though Rozenberg admits of other possibilities including Lady Hale who gave a dissenting judgment in R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011], which appears to have irritated some of her male colleagues - see, for example, the judgment at para 27. [read post]
