Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2008, 7:18 pm
You an read the underlying opinion here.Michael Martin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
JASTA cited Halberstam v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 10:14 am
(A prior mandamus does not preclude a subsequent appeal).Hatton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:11 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
16-0854Case Style: HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:50 am
By Dennis Crouch Nautilus v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
In Harris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm
Harris — drug-sniffing dog’s “alert” as probable cause to search a car or truck Mon., Nov. 5: 11-864 — Comcast v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
This conclusion would implicitly conflict with the uncited Harris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
Recently, in EEOC v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:11 am
Scott v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:54 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:29 pm
See Harris Cnty. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Harris is not a watershed development in the theory of racial gerrymandering. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:42 am
Law enforcement officials issued a subpoena to Twitter seeking email information and tweets for the period from 9/15/11 to 12/31/11 for account @destructuremal, a Twitter account allegedly used by Harris.In his decision against Harris, Judge Sciarrino said Twitter does not guarantee its users complete privacy. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:59 am
See Bear Creek Township v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:33 am
Doe, 518 U.S. 1014, 116 S.Ct. 2543, 135 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1996); see also Harris v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Harris, in which the Court will consider the preemptive effect of the Federal Meat Inspection Act. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Finally, Justice Breyer outlined the case’s broader potential implications, noting that in Harris v. [read post]
