Search for: "Hart v. Hart" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 4:25 pm by Attorney Theodore Ronca
The “Nickel” claims, as well as the earlier “Hart v Pageprint/De Kalb”, 6 AD 3d 947, reversed closing settlements because the Board procedure of having a hearing prior to approving a closing was not followed. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
An opportunity for defendants to shift the balance of power and wrest complete control over the company can constitute irreparable injury (see Vanderminden v Vanderminden, 226 AD2d 1037, 1041 [1996]; Casita, LP v Maplewood Equity Partners [Offshore] Ltd., 17 Misc 3d 1137A, *8 [2007]; see also Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., 114 AD2d 363, 366 [1985]). [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Tzanou, The Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Normative Value in the Context of Counter-Terrorism Surveillance (Oxford, Hart Publishing 2017), Maria Tzanou, Keele University. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
HART; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-04-00436-CV, 240 SW3d 16, 07-05-07)08-0077DANIEL K. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by GuestPost
We are pleased to welcome the latest post in our series of  responses to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in A, B & C v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 12 November 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 3035 (QB). [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 6:24 am by Guest Blogger
Consider the case of John Hart Ely, who in 1973 wrote a famous critique of Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
, heard 15 January 2016 (Sir David Eady) Hiranandani-Vandrevala v Times Newspapers Limited, heard 20 January 2016 (Nicol J) Burrell v Clifford, heard 25 and 26 January 2016 (Richard Spearman QC) Lokhova v Tymula, heard 26 and 27 January 2016 (Dingemans J) Monks v National Westminster Bank plc heard 28 and 29 January 2016 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"That jurisdiction includes all cases of every description in law and equity, from the most important and complicated to the most simple and insignificant" (Nestor v McDowell, 81 NY2d 410, 415 [1993], quoting Maresca v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 242 [1984]; De Hart v Hatch, 3 Hun 375, 380), and includes any new classes of actions or proceedings that the Legislature may create (see NY Const, art VI, § 7 [b]; Kagen v 193 Misc.2d 435] Kagen, 21… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:08 am by Lawrence Solum
CALL FOR PAPERS & PARTICIPATION ClassCrits V From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream Sponsored by University of Wisconsin Law School & The Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School Madison, WI, November 16-17, 2012 Keynote Speaker: Professor Erik Olin Wright, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am by Meg Martin
Ruppert of Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, WY.Representing Amicus Curiae Northern Cheyenne Tribe: John C. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]