Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
This chart helps me keep track: Dead Alive Case Circuit Affected States Year Case Circuit Affected States Year Murphy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:12 pm
United States, No. 06-0106 (2d Cir. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:39 pm
Gray-market goods are goods manufactured abroad by the owner of a United States trademark, legally purchased abroad from authorized distributors and then imported by persons other than the trademark holder and without the trademark holder's permission. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 4:39 pm
Gray-market goods are goods manufactured abroad by the owner of a United States trademark, legally purchased abroad from authorized distributors and then imported by persons other than the trademark holder and without the trademark holder's permission. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:22 am
Here, Defendant asserts that, under Brady v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
In contrast, licensing at the component level—or the smallest salable unit—ensures that SEP holders are compensated for the value of their invention instead of the other features of complex, multi-component products.Overall, it is not efficiency and innovation that drives SEP holders’ arguments, but rather that licensing to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)—entities that manufacture devices such as mobile telephones—is much more… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm
The United States could advocate its approach--being the last major jurisdiction not to force SEP holders or implementers into global license agreement--at the WTO level and/or through bilateral talks. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:49 pm
United States (1992), the government spent more than two years trying to get the defendant to put in an order for child pornography. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am
See Exhibit A (InterDigital Communications Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Service has provided additional guidance on the implementation of the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:38 am
§602(a)(1), allowed it to block importation of the wristwatches because it had not authorized those watches to be sold in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:04 pm
On Tuesday, December 1, in United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
s non-organic mushrooms into the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm
United States, was heard before the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:40 am
In Omega v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm
The most thoroughly developed of these proposes a legislative restructuring of copyright exhaustion in a flexible, multi-factor format, in part modeled on the United States’ fair use doctrine. [read post]
