Search for: "Hong v. Hong" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017) On the eve of the November 2017 meeting between the leaders of the United States and China, "John F. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
Spar Shipping as v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company Ltd, [2015] EWHC 718 (Comm). 2. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am by Benjamin Bissell
Ben noted Diane Webber’s account of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Hassan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:44 am by admin
They base their conclusion on the landmark 1922 Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:53 am by Rob Robinson
TransPerfect has global headquarters in New York, with regional headquarters in London and Hong Kong. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: Patent bar, doctors face off in Prometheus v Mayo (The Prior Art)   US Copyright Rights owners taking on small victims – Warner Music vs ‘Keyboard Cat’ YouTube clip; DC Comics vs John Stacks over figurines; Frank Gaylord vs postal service over art image on stamps (1709 Copyright Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court Colorado: Republishing third party rankings in marketing material might be copyright/trade mark… [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
There are some fantastic cases from India (§2.2.2) and Hong Kong (§2.3.3) in the casebook that demonstrate attentive judicial dialogue between jurisdictions. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 28 March 2017, Popplewell J handed down judgment in Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWHC 644 (QB). [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Hong Kong Legislator Junius Ho Kwan-yiu has filed a defamation claim against lawyer Kevin Yam after he wrote an opinion piece urging other lawyers not to vote for Ho in an upcoming leadership election of the Law Society. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Copinger (17th ed), [22-18], p 1626, n 94 cites the Hong Kong case of Hksar v Chan Nai Mang (2005), in which it was held that the meaning of “affect prejudicially” was wide in scope and not necessarily restricted to economic prejudice, although that was the obvious area at which the section was directed. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
They have also amplified China’s propaganda abroad, including by allowing Chinese government officials to use their platforms to spread misinformation regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to undermine pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. [read post]