Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 1001 - 1020 of 23,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2021, 3:08 pm by Corynne McSherry
SAS is desperately hoping that the Federal Circuit will say otherwise, based on the Federal Circuit’s previous ruling, in Oracle v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:30 am by IPWatchdog
Todd Dickinson of Polsinelli, Judge Theodore Essex of Hogan Lovells, Retired Chief Judge Paul Michel, and Robert Stoll of Drinker Biddle discussed the Supreme Court case eBay Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:06 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
United States and with this order died the hopes of insurers nationwide that we would finally have resolution of the equitable apportionment issue in Medicare reimbursements. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:30 pm
There is a lot of hope for next year. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:48 am by Orin Kerr
But the last news cycle suggests that Ginsburg v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:00 am by Charles Nichols
  The parties jointly requested this hearing, hoping Judge Krieger would rule on the gain element of Mr. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:13 pm
Or maybe in the hope (and expectation, likely) that someone would run, and boom, all of the sudden, probable cause.Which works from a policing standpoint. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:20 pm
When I read the Court of Appeal's opinion way back in 2013, I immediately wrote a lengthy missive -- some would say diatribe -- I said that the opinion seemed totally and completely wrong to me, and that I hoped the California Supreme Court would take the case up and reverse it. [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:05 pm
  Not exactly what you'd hoped for when you had the bright idea to acquire some cocaine with ripped up phone books.Working at McDonald's and the like may not be fun, and you'll definitely not get rich quickly (if at all). [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Substance of Things Hoped For: Faith, Social Action & Passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 46 Cum. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
On 27 July, amidst the traditional flurry of judgments handed down at the end of the Trinity term, a 7 strong Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker, Hale, Mance, Collins and Clarke) gave its ruling in the Belmont Park case, concerning the applicability of the principle of the common law on insolvency known as the ”anti-deprivation rule”. [read post]