Search for: "IN RE: B.R."
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2007, 7:13 pm
Judge Rosenthal recently held In re Munger, — B.R. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 4:24 pm
The Ninth Circuit adopted the holding of an earlier BAP decision, In re Sierra Steel, Inc., 96 B.R. 271, 274 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 5:58 pm
See, e.g., In re Allegheny Health, Education and Research Foundation, 292 B.R. 68, 94-95 (Bankr. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:13 am
In In re Battle, ___ B.R. ___, 2006 WL 3702734 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Tex.) [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:09 am
" In re Randy, 189 B.R. 425, 437 n.17 (Bkrtcy N.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 9:20 am
” The opinion cites an earlier BAP decision In re Beeney, 142 B.R. 360, 363-64 (Bankr. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 12:07 pm
" The Debtors relied on In re Sorrell, 359 B.R. 167 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2007) in which Judge Waldron held that unemployment compensation is excluded from CMI. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:09 pm
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has sharpened those tools in a recent decision: In re Macke International Trade, Inc., 2007 WL 1845519 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:45 am
Also, there is already one published decision to the contrary, In re Perfetto, 361 B.R. 27 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:53 am
Fla. 1995); In re Adell, 321 B.R. 562,569-70 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:37 am
In re Durham,361 B.R. 206, 209 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
Markell (a philosophical wizard who is one of the bankruptcy bench's most capable Code constructionists) in In re Trejos, 352 B.R. 249 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:21 am
See In re Horwitz, 167 B.R. 237 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 6:26 am
See, e.g., In re Payne, 347 B.R. 278 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:52 pm
In re Wright, 353 B.R. at 653; In re Chapman Lumber, 343 B.R. at 221; JBD Pork Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:59 am
The Court adopted the reasoning set forth in In re Ramussen, 349 B.R. 747 (Bankr.M.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:52 am
In re Duke, 345 B.R. 806 (Bankr.W.D.Ky.2006). [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Dupuis (In re Dupuis), 265 B.R. 878, 885 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 2001). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:32 am
In the case of In re Essential Therapeutics, 295 B.R. 203 (Bankr. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
" In re Randy, 189 B.R. 425, 437 n.17 (Bkrtcy N.D. [read post]