Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
The states claimed that the Clean Air Act (CAA) mandated this rule, so EPA’s delay violated the CAA. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:30 am by J. Dana Stuster
It is a last-minute reminder of the occupation which they hate before they enter the one place in Palestine in which they rule,” Haaretz’s Chemi Shalev wrote last week. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 7:19 am by Michael Geist
The Board’s rulings are and will continue to be challenged, but there is an established system to address appeals. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
Viacom did market goods and services associated with the SpongeBob Squarepants marks, but this seems like an incorrect ruling if Krusty Krabb was never promoted separately. *  In re Driven Innovations, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
It provided an in-depth discussion of California’s leading case on military pension shifting, In re Marriage of Krempin (1999) 70 CA4th 1008, and its dissection of the majority rule (22 states, including California, allowing for some equitable remedy to the non-military spouse in the form of support reassessment or redistribution of martial property) and minority rule (5 states allowing for no remedy) nationwide. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 2:32 pm by Daniel Wasserstein
  Official Records (Access by Renters):  A renter of a unit now has the right to inspect and copy the association’s bylaws and rules. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
Of those who paid, 50 percent paid more than $10,000 and 20 percent paid more than $40,000. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:37 pm by Jim Sedor
Kobach recently sent letters to all 50 states asking them to provide the commission with their entire voter files. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Pay ​up to $50 for each day, or part of a day, for each person the employer failed to pay minimum wage. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:50 pm by PBS NewsHour
The government asks the Supreme Court to review two federal appellate court rulings that struck down the executive order, one, and they ruled separately, claiming that the order violated the Establishment Clause of the constitution because it was religious discrimination. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  Petitioner asks: Whether the Federal Circuit’s issuance of Rule 36 judgments without opinions for the disposition of appeals from the Patent Office violates 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 7:30 am by Andrew Delaney
A week after the old agreement expired, the Town cited the Club for noise violations (I assume because club members showed up to do some shooting as they normally would) on two occasions. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
Is it just as easy when the only threat is the abstract possibility of an ISP violating your privacy? [read post]