Search for: "In Re Holmes"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
This is like the dog that didn’t bark in Sherlock Holmes: how do you know what you’re missing? [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:17 am
(I’d say Marshall, Holmes, Jackson, Scalia, and Black.) [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:45 pm
We're providing these start dates by firm name, and by date. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:50 am
They're vicious. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:12 am
We're providing these start dates by firm name, and by date (thanks in part to the help of Breaking Media's Winnie Liu). [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:01 pm
Oliver Wendell Holmes would love twitter. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:07 am
(Ed. note: We're continuing to update the list as new tips come in. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 12:54 am
If you've read the recently republished Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:56 am
They're also still honoring a $10K salary advance they had previously offered. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:59 pm
In re Bass (2003). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:31 am
Can't wait for the new Sherlock Holmes movie. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
Or else.p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- Donald Kelso (right) has a lot to smile about.He's a partner at Holme Roberts & Owen, the Denver law firm which boasts, "No matter how complex your problem may be, we're listening".Unless you happen to be Brittany Kruger, an 18-year-old junior at Northern Michigan University in Marquette.Because, said a Pay Up Or Else extortion letter from him to her dated March 23, she had 14 days to settle false corporate music… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:49 pm
For five days Michael and I worked with staff in detail, building a total of four sims from scratch in SIMPLE, showing staff how their already sophisticated content could be re-purposed and embedded around a narrative design. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:30 am
In Fenton v Holmes [2007] EWHC 2476 (Ch) the Court was faced with a CFA document which had been signed by both the solicitor and client. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:20 am
One of the reasons we're seeing widespread associate layoffs--apart from the pure economic imperative to cut costs in order to match revenues to capacity--as to do with morale. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Either: (a) massive litigations will not be pursued because they're too complicated, uncertain, protracted, and expensive; and/or (b) if they must be pursued, contract attorneys, staff attorneys, and outsourcers will provide the human throw-weight needed for massive document review; and/or (c) corporations will simply insist that document review be completed for flat fees of $X/unit [$1.00/page? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
They're both mighty important; this raises the obvious question, what do we mean by legal thinker? [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
The police report further indicated that Piontkowski was going to re-interview plaintiff and then forward the matter to the New York State Insurance Frauds Bureau. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
If we’re compiling a list of unacceptable online behaviours for lawyers, this would be in my top-10. [read post]
