Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe" Results 1001 - 1020 of 7,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
" {This prong is rooted in the principle of res judicata, and parents who seek modification must show "the change justifies departing from the principles of res judicata underlying the order currently in place. [read post]
Although it has only been a little over a year since nonfungible tokens came into the mainstream, the industry has taken a number of twists and turns, not the least of which is the granting of certain commercial exploitation rights in the digital works associated with an NFT. [read post]
31 May 2022, 7:58 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
A benefit requestor’s desire to travel for vacation does not, in general, meet the definition of an emergency. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
This case demonstrates the need for Petitioners to supply the fullest possible information when they submit their Petitions. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit reversed, re-instating the half-inch limit. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:28 pm
Surely the fact that they've been charged does not mean they're ineligible for benefits, right? [read post]
24 May 2022, 7:08 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The North Carolina Court of Appeals recognized this in In re J.V.J., 209 N.C.App. 737, 740 (2011), noting that section 7B–2411 does not require the trial court to delineate each element of an offense and state in writing the evidence which satisfies each element, and we recognize that section 7B–2411 does not specifically require that an adjudication order contain appropriate findings of fact. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   Discussion Judge Oetken’s rejection of the Monteverde firm’s fee petition is a welcome development, as it underscores the extent to which these merger objection lawsuits that are invariably filed following news of an M&A transaction produce no benefit for the shareholders – and that the plaintiffs’ lawyers ought not to be rewarded simply for filing a lawsuit that has no value and does nothing. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:22 am by Bona Law PC
His partner replied, “That’s the problem, they’re all the same. [read post]
20 May 2022, 8:52 pm by Andrew Hamm
These and other petitions of the week are below: In re Grand Jury 21-1397Issue: Whether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney-client privilege when obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the significant purposes behind the communication. [read post]