Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2011, 1:57 pm by Brad Pauley
In re N.M., S195757—Review Denied [Kennard, J., voting for review]—September 28, 2011 This was a child dependency proceeding initiated by a county Health and Human Services Agency. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:59 pm
The issue is no longer res integra and I just need to note the decision of the Supreme Court in K.Bhaskaran? [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
We’re the good guys; they are the bad guys. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Answer #4 You MUST provide each applicant with a complete copy of the entire petition (including the LCA), it is a REQUIREMENT, and you must retain a complete copy of the petition within the applicant’s immigration file (public access file). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:04 pm
 (I've replaced "Trump" with "Romney" here and throughout this post because they're basically arguing the same thing.) [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
 We're pleased to see the USDA act progressively in putting forward an initiative that should greatly enhance public health and safety rather than waiting for another major foodborne illness outbreak to spur them to action. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 12:36 pm by The Legal Blog
But where a prosecution is directed, it means that the authority who gives the direction is satisfied in his own mind that the case must be initiated. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Single Judge dismissed Anita Garg's petition under Section 34 challenging the arbitral awards on the ground of the principle of public policy of res judicata (check out the comment of the Single Judge's decision in the Indian Corp Law blog). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Section 4 deals with obligations of public authorities to maintain the records in the manner provided and publish and disseminate the information in the manner provided. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
§ 544(b). [*4] Most courts, however, have held that state fraudulent transfer rules do not reach disclaimers that relate back. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:37 pm
The FWS had separately settled with WildEarth Guardians (“WEG”) in twelve related lawsuits that had been consolidated with CBD’s action in In Re Endangered Species Act Section 4 Deadline Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2165 (D.D.C.). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Every oral argument and judicial ruling, going back over a year now, prompts a new round of press releases and re-jiggering of briefs for the next case. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
No. 66-1307, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. (1980), 3-4. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
The Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur(1976) 4 SCC 124 this court held that the doctrine of stare decisis is a very valuable principle of precedent which cannot be departed from unless there are extraordinary or special reasons to do so. [read post]