Search for: "In re Sullivan " Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
At a hearing on Friday September 13, Kent County Circuit Court Judge Paul Sullivan denied Phillips' request for re-sentencing, and kept the nine to 15 year sentence in place. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Law360 (sub. req.)] * Strippers aren’t independent contractors, they’re employees entitled to minimum wage, says a judge. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:09 am
To continue receiving STAR benefits in 2014, a new law requires homeowners to re-affirm their eligibility. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The bureaucracy in India brings Gilbert & Sullivan to life: “He has been corresponding with himself for the last 26 days as an officer wearing different hats. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think such closed-mindedness is unfortunate and counterproductive, and if we don’t stop to understand what others are saying—even when we don’t like it—we’re doomed forever to talk past each other. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:05 am by Staci Zaretsky
[National Law Journal] * If you’re interested in applying to a top 14 law school, make sure your stats and your story are both compelling. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
It does a great job demonstrating that the interplay between the First Amendment and the publicity rights is completely anarchy, which isn't surprising given that we don't really understand what we're trying to accomplish with the publicity rights doctrines in the first place. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:27 pm
In the event that you’re surprised that a Boston criminal lawyer would say this, don’t be: I’m a lawyer. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:34 pm
The widow and daughter of decedent and one other person appear specially and object to the jurisdiction of the Surrogate's Court of Sullivan County. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am by Ronald Collins
Sullivan (1991) (defending free speech restrictions placed on government-funded programs), one might have thought that John Roberts would have a cramped view of the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:10 am by Brady Sullivan
    Prioritizing “where to start” and minimizing regulatory burdens would, according to Shelanski, begin with lookback efforts led by agency heads who “know best how the rules they have on the books fit with new rules they’re putting in place. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm by David Lat
Just because you’re in management doesn’t mean you’re safe from layoffs. [read post]
28 May 2013, 10:57 am by David Lat
If you’re a defendant in a salacious sexual harassment lawsuit, should you disclose that when seeking pro hac vice admission? [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:46 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
The great Supreme Court defamation cases of the post-Sullivan/pre-Internet era were largely fought by the institutional media, and this is often reflected in the language of the Court. [read post]