Search for: "JOHN DOE "
Results 1001 - 1020
of 40,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2017, 11:11 am
The complainant, Jane Roe, alleged that the sex was not consensual; the respondent, John Doe, insisted that it was. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
This defense does not apply here either. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:02 pm
It does not have the right to destroy you. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 10:18 am
“Precedent Does Not Protect Preferences; It would be a mistake to assume the Court’s robust conception of precedent for statutory cases should preclude it from reconsidering affirmative action”: John O. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:07 pm
., non-trial) program called the “John Diversion Program. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
It does not appear as though Mendoza or any of Mendoza's family or friends have commented publicly on the allegations. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:34 am
Indianapolis, IN - Trademark lawyers for AFC Enterprises, Inc. of Georgia, doing business as Popeye's Chicken, filed a trademark infringement suit alleging Christopher Payne, LP&P Foods, and ten John Does of Indiana infringed trademark registration no. 1030944 for the mark POPEYES, 1107575 POPEYE SIGN DESIGN WITH COLOR and numerous other trademarks registered with the US Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:13 am
Does he know how to run a campaign or employ consultants who do? [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 pm
A “John Doe” summons is an order that does not specifically identify the person but rather identifies a person or ascertainable group or class by their activities. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:19 am
Google, a New York court has reaffirmed the principle that "John Doe" identity information cannot be disclosed absent:-prior notice to the anonymous person;-affording the anonymous person an opportunity to be heard in opposition to the application; and-an evidentiary showing of a prima facie case against the anonymous person.Application of this principle to the RIAA cases would defeat all of the RIAA's ex parte discovery applications.October 23, 2007, Decision of… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:40 am
Two new reports of survey suggest various reasons why John and Jane Doe are withholding individual charitable contributions, including one that reports that they think John and Jan RichDoe should be contributing more. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:20 pm
The Washington Post, amongst others, is reporting speculations concerning the retirement of the Court's oldest Justice, John Paul Stevens: It is tea-leaf reading time at the Supreme Court: Does Justice John Paul Stevens's decision to hire only one clerk for... [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 10:28 am
Over at John Flood's RATs blog site -- he is a British law-and-society prof who occasionally does stateside duty teaching legal ethics in U.S. law schools -- John posts the wonderful cartoon below, debates a commenter over whether the joke... [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:11 pm
Eugene Goryunov, John Marshall Law School (Chicago), has published "All Rights Reserved: Does Google's 'Image Search' Infringe Vested Exclusive Rights Granted Under the Copyright Law? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
While it is true that her will does not mention John when distributing her tangible personal property, Article V of her will leaves the remainder of... [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
And I hope I hope John Edwards is not indicted. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:38 am
We previously sketched an outline of the typical recording industry lawsuit: "(1) the mass lawsuit against a large number of 'John Does'; (2) the "ex parte" order of discovery; and (3) the subpoenas demanding the names and addresses of the 'John Does'. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
Shortly after the court ordered the support payments, husband John Lee Shippen joined the Twelve Tribes of Israel, a religious commune that prohibits its members from earning outside income. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:38 am
And the pattern does not diminish as you move away from the experience of the Sixties. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:43 am
So when if fact does Massachusetts require the informant's identity to be disclosed? [read post]
