Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
[T]he 11th Circuit handed down a new computer search decision,United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
  That was the Court’s holding Wednesday in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:46 pm by David Oscar Markus
From Orin Kerr:[T]he Supreme Court will hold argument in an interesting Fourth Amendment case, Kansas v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
  In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:07 pm
The district court had dismissed the case on the grounds that the auditor, who received relevant information from an employee of the State of Louisiana, was not the "original source" of the information on which the claim was based. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am by SHG
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  At The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr analyzes the Court’s summary opinion in Grady v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has a post on the “surprisingly narrow argument” made by the petitioners in City of Ontario v. [read post]